Primary colonisation of newly formed soils by actinedid mites
Keywords:
Actinedida, succession, sand, colonisationAbstract
In the brown-coal open-cast mining district near Cottbus, Germany, an artificial, experimental water- catchment system was constructed in 2005. The purpose of the experiment is to observe the development of the soil ecosystem during simulated primary succession. Within these studies the development of the soil fauna has been monitored since late 2005, of which the results regarding actinedid mites are presented here. Actinedida represented the major microarthropod group colonising the newly developing soils, having been present within months after exposition of the substrates to the surface, albeit in very low densities and only in sporadic samples. Initially, species richness was also extremely low, with practically only Nanorchestes sp. und Speleorchestes sp. present. Three years after site initiation, the abundances and species richness increased significantly, although they were still low compared to mature soils. The microarthropod communities continued to be strongly dominated by actinedid mites and colonisation of the soils remained spatially heterogeneous. The sporadic individual-richness was mostly caused by strong population development of single species in a few samples, e.g., Siteroptes sp. and Bakerdania sp. The abundance and distribution of Nanorchestes sp. originally increased strongly in the first two years. However, as many more species were found thereafter, the density of this species decreased briefly; dramatically in samples containing high densities of Siteroptes sp., indicating successional species replacement. Remarkable is the occurrence of species such as Cheletomimus vescus, Hawaiieupodes thermophilus and Xerophiles ereynetoides, which are rare, most likely xero- thermophilous species adapted to nutrient-poor soils. The results described here represent only those of the first 2.5 years and sampling and evaluation will continue.
References
Berg, M. P. & L. Hemerik (2004): Secondary succession of terrestrial isopod, centipede, and millipede communities in grasslands under restoration. – Biology and Fertility of Soils 40: 163–170.
Bieri, M., V. Delucchi & C. Lienhard (1978): Ein abgeänderter Macfadyen-Apparat für die dynamische Extraktion von Bodenarthropoden. – Bulletin de la Société Entomologique Suisse 51: 119–132.
Bochkov, A. V., M. Hakimitabar & A. Saboori (2005): A review of the Iranian Cheyletidae (Acari: Prostigmata). – Belgian Journal of Entomology 7: 99–109.
Cepeda-Pizzaro, J. G. & W. G. Whitford (1989): Spatial and temporal variability of higher microarthropod taxa along a transect in a northern Chihuahuan Desert watershed. – Pedobiologia 33: 101–111.
Cepeda-Pizzaro, J. G., J. R. Gutiérrez, Valderrama & H. Vasquez (1996): Phenology of the edaphic microarthropods in a Chilean coastal desert site and their response to water and nutrient amendments to the soil. – Pedobiologia 40: 352–363.
Curry, J. P. (1994): Grassland Invertebrates. Ecology, Influence on Soil Fertility and Effects on Plant Growth. – Chapman & Hall, London, UK: 437 pp.
Dunger, W. & H.-J. Fiedler (2000): Methoden der Bodenbiologie. – Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart New York: 432 pp.
Dunger W., H.-J. Schulz & B. Zimdars (2002): Colonization behaviour of Collembola under different conditions of dispersal. – Pedobiologia 46: 316–327.
Dunger, W., H.-J. Schulz, B. Zimdars & K. Hohberg (2004). Changes in collembolan species composition in Eastern German mine sites over fifty years of primary succession. – Pedobiologia 48: 503–517.
Dunger, W., M. Wanner, H. Hauser, K. Hohberg, H.-J. Schulz, T. Schwalbe, B. Seifert, J. Vogel, K. Voigtländer, B. Zimdars & K. P. Zulka (2001). Development of soil fauna at mine sites during 46 years after afforestation. – Pedobiologia 45: 243–271.
Edney, E. B., P .J. Franco & J. F. McBrayer (1975): Abundance and distribution of soil microarthropods in Rock Valley, Nevada. – US/IBP Desert Biome Research Memorandum 76-24, Reports of 1975 Progress, Vol. 3, Invertebrate Section: 11–27.
Elmer, M., K. Hohberg, D. J. Russell, A. Christian, H.-J. Schulz & M. Wanner (in press): Succession of the soil faunal community during initial ecosystem development. – Ecosystem Development.
Franco, P. J., E. B. Edney & J. F. McBrayer (1979): The distribution and abundance of soil arthropods in the Northern Mojave desert. – Journal of Arid Environments 2: 137–149.
Frouz, J, V. Pi□l & K. Tajovský (2007): The effect of earthworms and other saprophagous macrofauna on soil microstructure in reclaimed and un-reclaimed post-mining sites in Central Europe. – European Journal of Soil Biology 43: 184–189.
Gerwin W., W. Schaaf, D. Biemelt, A. Fischer & S. Winter (2009): The artificial catchment ‘Chicken Creek’ (Lusatia, Germany) – A landscape laboratory for interdisciplinary studies of initial ecosystem development. – Ecological Engineering 35: 1786–1796.
Greenslade, P. & A. Clift (2004): Review of pest arthropods recorded from commercial mushroom farms in Australia. – The Australasian Mycologist 23: 77–93.
Hohberg, K. (2003): Soil nematode fauna of afforested mine sites: genera distribution, trophic structure and functional guilds. – Applied Soil Ecology 22: 113–126.
Hohberg, K., D. J. Russell & M. Elmer (in press): Mass occurrence of algal-feeding tardigrade Apodibius confusus Dastych, 1983 in the young soils of a post-mining site. – Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research.
Hodkinson, I. D., S. J. Coulson & N. R. Webb (2004): Invertebrate community assembly along proglacial chronosequences in the high Arctic. – Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 556–568.
Jesionowksa, K. (2003): Xerophiles ereynetoidalis, a new mite genus and species of the family Eupodidae (Actinotrichida, Actinedida, Eupodoidea) from Poland. – Acta Biologica Cracoviensia 45: 11–18.
Jesionowksa, K. (2008): Redescription of Hawaiieupodes thermophilus Strandtmann et Goff, 1978 (Acari: Prostigmata: Eupodoidea: Penthalodidae) from Hawaii, with a discussion of the systematic status of the taxon. – Annales Zoologica 58: 337–346.
Kaźmierski, A. (1998): Tydeinae of the world: generic relationships, new and redescribed taxa and keys to all species. A revision of the subfamilies Pretydeinae and Tydeinae (Acari: Actinedida: Tydaidae) – part IV. – Acta Zoologica Cracoviensia 41: 283–455.
Kethley, J. (1990): Acarina: Prostigmata (Actinedida). - In: Dindal, D. L. (ed.) Soil Biology Guide. – J. Wiley & Sons, New York Chichester Brisbane: 667–756.
Khaustov, A. A. (2008): Mites of the family Scutacaridae of Eastern Paleaearctic. – Akadem-periodyka, Kiev: 290 pp.
Kinnear, A. (1991): Acarine communities of semi-arid soils from the Eastern Goldfields region of Western Australia. – Pedobiologia 35: 273–283.
Koehler, H. & H. Born (1998): Secondary succession of soil mesofauna: a thirteen year study. – Applied Soil Ecology 9: 81–86.
Kurosa, K. (2002): A new genus and species of Pygmephoridae (Acari: Heterostigmata) associated with
Onthophagus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) in Japan. – Journal of the Acarological Society of Japan 11: 27–36. Lussenhop, J. (1972): Distribution and phenology of a prairie soil arthropod population. – Mid-West Prairie Conference 2: 60–72.
Macfadyen, A. (1961): Improved funnel-type extractors for soil arthropoda. – Journal of Animal Ecology 30: 71–184.
Masan, P. (1993): Mites (Acarina) associated with species of Trox (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). European Journal of Entomology 90: 359–364.
McDaniel, B. & E. G. Bolen (1981): A new genus and two new species of Nanorchestidae from Padre Island, Texas (Acari: Prostigmata). – Acarologia 22: 253–256.
Noble, J. C., W. G. Whitford & M. Kaliszweski (1996a): Soil and litter microarthropod populations from two contrasting ecosystems in semi-arid eastern Australia. – Journal of Arid Environments 32: 329–346.
Norton, R. A., J. B. Kethley, D. E. Johnston & B. M. OConner (1993): Phylogenetic perspectives on genetic systems and reproductive modes of mites. – In: Wrensch, D. & M. Ebbert (eds): Evolution and Diversity of Sex Ratio in Insects and Mites. – Chapman & Hall, London, UK: 8–99.
OConnor, B. M. (1984): Phylogenetic relationships among higher taxa in the Acariformes, with particular reference to the Astigmata. – In: Griffiths, D. A. & C. E. Bowman (eds): Acarology VI, Vol. 1. – Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK: 19–27.
Petersen, H. & M. Luxton (1982): A comparative analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes. – Oikos 39: 284–422.
Rack, G. & P. H. Vercammen-Grandjean (1979): Siteroptes (Siteroptoides) trombidiphilus sp. n. (Acarina: Pygmephoridae) phoretisch auf einem Weibchen der Familie Trombidiidae (Acarina) aus Ostafrika. – Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum Hamburg 6: 217–220.
Russell, D. J. & A. Griegel (2006): Influence of variable inundation regimes on soil Collembola. – Pedobiologia 50: 165–175.
Santos, P. F. & W. G. Whitford (1983): Seasonal and spatial variation in the soil microarthropod fauna of the white sands national monument. – Southwestern Naturalist 28: 417–421.
Santos, P. F., E. DePree & W. G. Whitford (1978): Spatial distribution of litter and microarthropods in a Chihuahuan desert ecosystem. – Journal of Arid Environments 1: 41–48.
Savulkina, M. M. (1981): The system, ecology and distribution of the mite family Pygmephoridae [in Russian]. – Entomological Review (St.-Petersburg) 60: 434–450.
Schöps, F.-R. & D. J. Russell (2004): Ein modifiziertes Friedman-Test (nicht-parametrische ANOVA) für quantitativen Auswertungen von Bodenmesofauna-Daten. – Mitteillungen der AG Bodenmesofauna 20: 31–35.
Steinberger, Y. (1990): Acarofauna of a Negev desert loess plain. – Acarologia 31: 313–319.
Steinberger, Y. & W. G. Whitford (1984): Spatial and temporal relationships of soil microarthropods on a desert watershed. – Pedobiologia 26: 275–284.
Steinberger, Y., E. F. Aldon & W. G. Whitford (1990): Soil microarthropod fauna of four habitats of the Rio Puerco watershed, New Mexico. – Southwestern Naturalist 35: 279–284.
Suski, Z. W. (1973): A revision of Siteroptes cerealium (Kirchner) complex (Acarina, Heterostigmata, Pyemotidae). – Annales Zoologici Warszawa 30: 509–535.
Ufer, A., F. Schmider & G. Alberti (1993): Auswirkungen einer Bodenentseuchung auf die Populationen von Collembolen in Ackerbiozönosen. – In: Ehrnsberger, R. (ed.): Bodenmesofauna und Naturschutz. – Güner Runge, Cloppenburg: 355–367.
Volgin, V. I. (1989): Acarina of the Family Cheyletidae of the World. – Brill Archive, Leiden: 532 pp. Walker, L. R. & R. del Moral (2003): Primary succession and ecosystem rehabilitation. – Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge New York Port Melbourne Madrid: 442 pp.
Walter, D. E. (1988): Predation and Mycophagy by Endeostigmatid Mites (Acariformes: Prostigmata). – Experimental & Applied Acarology 4: 159–166.
Wardle, D. A. (2002): Communities and ecosystems – linking the aboveground and belowground components. – Monographs in Population Biology 34: 392 pp.
Wanner, M. & M. Elmer (2009): ‘Hot spots’ on a new soil surface – How do testate amoebae settle down? – Acta Protozoologica 48: 281–289.
Wanner, M. & W. E. R. Xylander (2005): Biodiversity development of terrestrial testate amoebae: is there any succession at all? – Biology and Fertility of Soils 41: 428–438.
Wanner, M., M. Elmer, M. Kazda & W. E. R. Xylander (2008): Community assembly of terrestrial testate amoebae: How is the very first beginning characterized? – Microbial Ecology 56: 43–54.
Whitford, W. G. & P. F. Santos (1980): Arthropods and detritus decomposition in desert ecosystems. – In: Dindal, D.L. (ed.): Soil Biology as Related to Land Use Practices. – EPA, Office of Pesticide and Toxic Substances, Washington DC, USA: 770–778.
Wood, T. G. (1971): The distribution and abundance of Folsomides deserticola (Collembola: Isotomidae) and other micro-arthropods in arid and semi-arid soils in Southern Australia, with a note on nematode populations. – Pedobiologia 11: 446–468.
Zacharda, M. (1978): Soil mites of the family Rhagidiidae (Actinedida: Eupodoidea). Morphology, Systematics, Ecology. – Acta Universitatis Carolinae Biologica 5-6: 489–790.
Zar, J. H. (1999): Biostatistical Analysis. 4th Edn. – Prentice Hall, London Sydney Toronto: 663 pp.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
All articles from Senckenberg’s SOIL ORGANISMS Open Access scientific journal that are made available on the Senckenberg website (www.senckenberg.de) and also www.soil-organisms.org may be read, copied, distributed, and (in limited quantity) printed for non-commercial, private, scientific purposes.
In accordance with the German Science Foundation’s „Rules for the Safeguarding of Good Scientific Practice“, references to cited articles are to be complete and correct and furnished with a link to the website of the Senckenberg journal in question.
The Senckenberg Society for Nature Research (Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, SGN) is a member of the Leibniz Association (Leibniz-Gemeinschaft) and is therefore committed to the idea of Open Access as explained in the Berlin Declaration (Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Scientific Knowledge, Berliner Erklärung über den offenen Zugang zu wissenschaftlichem Wissen).
Open Access is understood to mean the charge-exempt public access to scientific results via the internet. The users should be able to read, copy, print, search within, and reference the full text without limitation and to use it in any conceivable lawful manner without financial, legal or technical hindrance.
This applies also to the SGN, which publishes various scientific series. Some scientific journals are made available to the public via Open Acess in addition to printed copies.
